I'm thinking about printing out new mode dial markings, engraving them myself onto the dial, many options. The Sony A6600 is a new version of the mostly identical A6500 from 2016, adding a big NP-FZ100 battery with over twice the capacity of the old NP-FW50, but paradoxically removing the critical built-in flash.I'll presume this is as the A6600 is optimized for all kinds of … All of the Sony A6000 series have amazing autofocus, so if this is important to you, stick with Sony. The Sony a6600 mirrorless camera has a single SD card slot that supports UHS-I SD cards. The trouble is particularly with the A7 series Sony wants to sell it to pros and so slowly it is morphing into something it ought to have been from the off. Image quality, OK? No NTSC, no PAL, no MP4 and no 720p video. Another important factor is the availability of image stabilization. I see no benefit to replacing my A6000 until it dies. I have used almost all Sony APSC cameras since Nex 3and Sony still is too stubborn to do it right. If the A6500 gets cheaper I'll change. All full-frame FE and APS-C E-mount lenses work great as well. The fun part is that those who buy the camera will enjoy it, while those who don't find it good enough, not worth the money, too old tech, or not their "own" brand so that they have to say something negative anyway, hopefully will enjoy something else for their photography. Dozens of Kodak Retinas. It also comes as a kit with the 18-135mm OSS at Adorama, at Amazon, at B&H and at Crutchfield: Sony A6600 and Sony E 18-135mm OSS. The full-frame cameras are better if you really need ISOs above 25,600 (you don't) or need more than 24 megapixels, which you don't either. In Silent shutter mode I've only measured a maximum of 7 FPS, even with locked focus at 1/4,000. A6600 got 83% Silver, and A6000 got 80% Gold. The Canon RF 800mm F11's unique combination of telephoto reach, affordability and light weight will likely enable even more people to do the same. The A6000 series were designed to be compact. I think it is an absurd and a mistake. It's like pianos: anyone can talk forever about how pianos are made, but to most ordinary players the subtle variations between different samples of a Steinway Model D are eclipsed by their own limitations in playing, but when you're a virtuoso even subtle differences become obvious to the seasoned master. The A6500 costs less and takes better pictures because it has a built-in flash. The Sony E 10-18mm f/4 OSS s one of the good choices for best Sony E-mount lenses available as it is very sharp, focuses quickly, minimum distortion with a swift autofocus and it weighs only 7.9 ounces. [SOURCE, 2, 3] Related. The top & bottom plates, lens mount, front & rear covers and the top all-black dial are metal. The thing may or may not work that well, and probably won't give you anywhere near the resolution you thought you wanted unless you use the native Zeiss lenses. It's not 2018 anymore. All these companies keep pumping out MILCs like they were going out of style, and they still haven't figured out how to make the ergos better. Sony A6400 vs A6600. Easy to select the autofocus areas with the touch LCD as you look through the finder. Mine draws 485mA at 5V while charging, It draws 45mA when done, which is a bit high, but no big deal. Every top Nikon film SLR except the F6. Enter the Ulanzi ST-09, an adjustable mount that allows you to turn an Apple Watch into a live viewfinder on the rear of your iPhone. Sony's new Visual Story app for iOS promises event and wedding photographers a variety of useful tools, designed to simplify their workflow and enhance their business. The optics are OK, but still a little swimmy in spots due to the diopter adjustment optics. I just won’t pay $1300 to replace my APS-C camera. I for one would not switch to an Axxxx series. This is great, but that's the end of the good. As for the little Canon m6ii, a6600 is from another universe! I recommend them all personally. If you can't get a sharp photo, it's because you're doing something stupid, like shooting at f/32, aren't in focus, shooting at some stupid-high ISO or something moved or you're using an old lens on an adapter instead of a Zeiss lens. The only difference is that it has much bigger grip and more flexible LCD screen. You may just happen to prefer large, chunky bodies with large grips and traditional controls in the traditional places. The biggest gotcha with the Sony system is that there are very few native lenses for it, and most of Sony's and Minolta's lenses aren't that great; Zeiss, Canon and Nikon make better lenses. This should help with stills shooting in low light, to be sure, but also combines with excellent autofocus tracking to make it the best crop-sensor video shooter Sony currently sells. Despite its refinements, we still think the a6600 could benefit from some ergonomic updates to make it an easier camera to take control over. Big improvements in battery life and AF. The LCD isn't bright enough to see in direct sunlight. Now shoots at 7 FPS in Silent mode (MENU > CAMERA 2 > page 4/9 > Silent Shooting). I have been using one and it's performance is really amazing. On the other hand, with a tripod, follow-focus in 4K with just a touch on the part you want in focus is amazing and worth the trade-off if your viewer isn't an engineer or pixel-peeper! Same with the A7rIII. 2 This product is also known as ILCE-6600, ILCE-6600M, ILCE6600/B, ILCE6600M/B 3 ©2020 Sony Electronics Inc. You are one of my primary sources of research. Quite the opposite... easy to carry and to use quickly. I love its EVF, speed, tiny size, tough build and great looking pictures in any light âÂ as well as its completely silent operation â but I really miss the built-in flash for my style of still shooting, and now that Nikon has a superior APS-C mirrorless, the Nikon Z50, I wouldn't buy this camera except maybe if I was already neck-deep in Sony APS-C lenses. Who is the idiot in this village? Sony A6600 Comparison Review. As this page is copyrighted and formally registered, it is unlawful to make copies, especially in the form of printouts for personal use. So camera makers might not be so stupid to provide alternatives. Once you get the camera set it works very fast, but getting it set can be maddening since important menu options are carelessly spread all over its arbitrary menu system. Fujifilm's 3.00 firmware update adds a new Pixel Shift Mult-Shot mode to its GFX 100 camera that works alongside a new Pixel Shift Combiner program to output 400MP Raw images made up from 16 individual still images. The Nikon NOCT sells for what it does because collectors pay that much, while collectors haven't discovered the Canon 50mm f/1 which still sells for the same price it has for the past 25 years. I'd get my A6600 body at Adorama, at Amazon, at B&H or at Crutchfield. In actual use I get about 1,500 shots per charge! Crummy ergonomics, menus and handling compared to Canon and Nikon APS-C mirrorless cameras. I am red-green color blind. Cellphones are very ergonomic if all you do is p&s. Now offshored to China rather than Thailand like the A6500. It's Sony's awful menu system, crummy ergonomics and lack of built-in flash that need addressing; AF is flawless.