Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov. More details on the RAMESES II project's methods may be found at: a) Protocol the RAMESES II study:developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluationhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/8/e008567, b)Â Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II projecthttps://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/hsdr05280/#/abstract, Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/115, http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/volume-2/issue-30, http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/8/e008567. We purposively recruited a maximum variety sample of an international group of experts in realist evaluation to our online Delphi panel. The RAMESES II reporting guidelines for realist evaluations is an important initiative to ensure these evaluations are reported in sufficient detail, in the context of existing evidence, and with a rating of strength of evidence for main findings that will greatly assist users of the evaluations. The overall response rates for all items for rounds 1, 2 and 3 were 94 %, 76 % and 80 %, respectively. O'Sullivan B, McGrail M, Gurney T, Martin P. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Musa MK, Akdur G, Hanratty B, Kelly S, Gordon A, Peryer G, Spilsbury K, Killett A, Burton J, Meyer J, Fortescue S, Towers AM, Irvine L, Goodman C. BMJ Open. We prepared the briefing materials for our Delphi panel by summarising the most recent literature on realist evaluations to identify how and why rigour had been demonstrated and where gaps in expertise and rigour were evident. 2014;12:29. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-29. | BMJ. This approach offers the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas -for example, by explaining the success, failure or mixed fortunes of complex interventions. RAMESES II - developed quality and reporting standards and resources and training materials for realist evaluation. BMC Med. 2015;350:h1258. Get the latest research from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus. Within three rounds our Delphi panel was able to reach consensus on 20 items that should be included in the reporting standards for realist evaluations. In addition, the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) was adhered to . doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. The project's aim is to produce initial reporting standards for realist â¦ J Adv Nurs. These were then shared with the panel members and their feedback was sought. The projects' goals are to produce quality and publication standards and training materials for realist research approaches. Keywords: 2020 Oct 19;28:e3255. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3933.3255. This approach was used because a simple binary of success and failure is sometimes unhelpful when evaluating the complexities of changing services and systems [ 14 ]. As part of the RAMESES II project we commissioned an illustrator, Chris Lysy of freshspecturm to provide us with cartoons for the resources and training materials for realist evaluations that had a realist twist. We recruited 35 panel members from 27 organisations across six countries from nine different disciplines. We hope to build a community that enables peer-to-peer knowledge construction leading ultimately to community members having greater understanding and competence in undertaking these types of reviews. Manzi F, Marchant T, Hanson C, Schellenberg J, Mkumbo E, Mlaguzi M, Tancred T. Health Policy Plan. We hope that these standards will lead to greater consistency and rigour of reporting and make realist evaluation reports more accessible, usable and helpful to different stakeholders. Programme theory (ideas and assumptions of how a particular intervention works) development is the first step in a realist evaluation or a realist synthesis, with literature reviews providing important evidence to support this. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. collated and summarised existing literature on the principles of good practice in realist and meta-narrative systematic review; considered the extent to which these principles have been followed by published and in-progress reviews, thereby identifying how rigour may be lost and how existing methods could be improved; used an online Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of experts from academia and policy, produce a draft set of methodological steps and publication standards; produced training materials with learning outcomes linked to these steps; piloted these standards and training materials prospectively on real reviews-in-progress, capturing methodological and other challenges as they arise; synthesised expert input, evidence review and real-time problem analysis into more definitive guidance and standards. You can view the full series of cartoons on the Rameses website, along with a number of other great resources about realist evaluation, including Ray Pawson's video series. Inductive logic derives There are different forms of reasoning in research and evaluation. Retroduction in realist evaluation The RAMESES II Project What is retroduction? doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037224. A Realist Evaluation of Theory about Triggers for Doctors Choosing a Generalist or Specialist Medical Career. London: Sage; 1997. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040397. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! These approaches offer the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas - for example by explaining the success, failure or mixed fortunes of complex interventions. Background: doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa128. HHS Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. For realist evaluations (RE) this project aims to: develop quality and reporting standards and training materials; build capacity for undertaking and critically evaluating them; produce resources and training materials for lay participants, and those seeking to involve them. Director Postgraduate Research Studies; Director Advanced Qualitative Research Methods Training (AQUALM) ESRC White Rose DTP; Research interests This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES II project. We used a realist evaluation approach, guided by RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluation . Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Sep. BMC Med. G U I D E L I N E Open Access. realist evaluation. No previous publication standards exist for reporting realist syntheses. For this purpose, RAMESES II for realist evaluation were followed . RAMESES II Quality Standards for Realist Evaluation: For funders or commissioners of realist evaluations Resources and training materials for realist evaluation We have provided the resources and training materials in the order below as a guide to those who are starting out on their journey to learn about realist evaluation. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Realist evaluation is, as the name implies, a form of evaluation. The realist evaluation approach is a relatively new approach to evaluation, especially in some fields (such as health services research). Harnessing the health systems strengthening potential of quality improvement using realist evaluation: an example from southern Tanzania. 1 RAMESES II provides guidance on quality assurance and uniform reporting for improving quality and consistency of realist evaluation studies (Wong et al., 2017). Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: realist evaluation of the Leadership Development Programme for district manager decision-making in Ghana. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project Geoff Wong,1* Gill Westhorp,2 Joanne Greenhalgh,3 Ana Manzano,3 Justin Jagosh4 and Trisha Greenhalgh1 1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK I'm a co-author of the Rameses standards for realist evaluation. NIH realist evaluation covering the same kind of project or programme. I heartily endorse Alice's suggestion of joining the Rameses discussion list. Panel members were asked to rank each potential item twice on a 7-point Likert scale, once for relevance and once for validity. | National Center for Biotechnology Information, Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. What is the difference between realist evaluation and realist synthesis? A realistic evaluation of fines for hospital discharges: Incorporating the history of programme evaluations in the analysis. Pawson R. The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. Its overall place in the toolkit of evaluation approaches is not yet fully established. No previous standards exist for reporting realist evaluations. RAMESES : Hide Latest Messages. Conclusions. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. There are hundreds of members and they are very good about providing advice and support. In this project we used a number of different approaches to develop our project outputs. 2 Acronym of âCommunity Orientated and Opportunity Learning Musicâ project. BMC Med. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. The realist evaluation approach is a relatively new approach to evaluation, especially in some fields (such as health services research). This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES II project. The RAMESES II reporting guidelines for realist evaluations is an important initiative to ensure these evaluations are reported in sufficient detail, in the context of existing evidence, and with a rating of strength of evidence for main findings that will greatly assist users of the evaluations. about Realist Evaluation The RAMESES II Project 1. The project's aim is to produce initial reporting standards for realist evaluations. Introduction Realist evaluation is an increasingly popular methodology in health services research. Content available from CC BY 2.0: RAMESES publication standards: Realist syntheses.pdf. Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Oct. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R. BMC Med. Conclusion: London: Sage; 2013. RAMESES I - (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) developed quality and publication standards and training materials for realist reviews and the related approach of meta-narrative reviews. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES II project. Language: English: PubMed ID: 27342217: Relevant URLs (full-text if available) Gill was a member of the Rameses research teams which developed the international publication standards and quality standards for realist evaluation and realist literature review. You can contact me at email@example.com if you want to discuss this further. Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency. 10/1008/07/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom, HS&DR/14/19/19/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom. eCollection 2020. COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation. Responsibilities. Methods: Epub 2013 Jan 29. Realist methodologies are increasingly being used to evaluate complex interventions in health and social care.